News, Newsletter, DOL, NIOSH, Hinnefeld, Howard

Video 1 title

This is an example of a Vimeo video, just edit the change the video link, edit the title and this description and if you like, you can also link the continue button to a web page....

Video 2 title

This is an example of a Vimeo video, just edit the change the video link, edit the title and this description and if you like, you can also link the continue button to a web page....

Video 3 title

This is an example of a Vimeo video, just edit the change the video link, edit the title and this description and if you like, you can also link the continue button to a web page....

Video 4 title

This is an example of a Vimeo video, just edit the change the video link, edit the title and this description and if you like, you can also link the continue button to a web page....

 Manhattan Project Badge

Help for EEOICPA claimants

Bookmark and Share
follow EECAP on facebook tweet EECAP EECAP YouTube Channel
get in touch
ANAG logo


Forgot your password?


ANWAG alerts DEEOIC to Problems with Changes made to Wage Loss Policy

On November 21 ANWAG sent a letter to Director Leiton discussing the problems caused by DEEOIC's changes to their policy on sick workers' lost wages.


ANWAG reports Problems on accessing EEOICPA forms to Director Howie

On November 4, 2016 ANWAG sent Director Leonard Howie a letter describing problems the public had in gaining access to forms that were identified in the Federal Register with a limited amount of time for the public to make comments on.


ANWAG Dismayed over Director Leiton's Disrespectful Remarks

On July 25, 2016 ANWAG sent a letter to Secretary Perez calling for Director Leiton's resignation over disrespectful remarks about claimants' doctors being dishonest.


DIAB Reports

  • 2014-4-3, Site Exposure Matrix Review: A Comparison between Site Processes and Labor Categories--Anonymous, Barrie, Jerison
  • 2014-9-10, Review of DEEOIC's Evidentiary Standard for Causation of Illnesses--Barrie
  • 2014-8-15, Adjudication of Hearing Loss Claims--Barrie, Hand, Manuta
  • 2015-6-17, As Likely As Not a Significant Factor: Procedure Manual Chapter 2-0700, Section 2.d.(2)--Barrie

    ANWAG Public Comments on Rules Changes

  • 2016-2-18 ANWAG Comments on Proposed Rules Changes 
  • 2016-4-12 ANWAG Additional Comments on Proposed Rules Changes


    Congress calls for Transparency and Independence in the EEOICPA Advisory Board on Toxic Substance and Worker Health

    The advocates have long anticipated the creation of an advisory board to the Department of Labor.  Legislation was passed in December to establish the Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health.  ANWAG sent a letter to Mr. Leonard Howie, Director of the Office of Worker Compensation Programs requesting an update on the board.  Legislative offices were copied on this letter.  On April 24th Congressional members sent a letter to President Obama to ensure that "worker health and advocate organizations with expertise on this issue" are consulted on the make-up of the Board and that Obama's Administration "ensure the Board is transparent and independent from the Department of Labor". 

     ANWAG, DIAB, and EECAP are deeply thankful for the continued support of these Congressional members.


    ANWAG Commends Bi-Partisan Congressional Action To Create
    Department of Labor Advisory Oversight Board

    On December 5, 2014 ANWAG and the DEEOIC Interim Advisory Board (DIAB) announced the formation of an independent advisory board.


    ANWAG requests Help from Secretary Perez

    On September 8, 2014 ANWAG sent a letter to Secretary Perez requesting his help with obtaining information needed to assist EEOICPA claimants and monitor the administration of DEEOIC.

    On September 23, 2014 the United Steelworkers wrote Secretary Perez to support of DEEOIC releasing the requested material to ANWAG and request that the DOL inspector general look into the possible overcharging of taxpayers.


    DEEOIC requests $3,403.50 to provide ANWAG with Information to help Claimants

    On August 26, 2014 DEEOIC replied to ANWAG's request for "Copies of all documents the US Department of Energy (DOE) supplied to Department of Labor's (DOL) Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC) and/or its Site Exposure Matrix (SEM) Administrator, Paragon Technical Industry, that provided detailed description for use in SEM of job responsibilities for guards, police, security or any other similar labor categories which provided security to the DOE facilities and/or the safeguarding of the materials and processes used to make the nuclear weapons."  DEEOIC denied the fee waiver request made by ANWAG based on an old appeal of a request for a fee waiver.


    ANWAG requests Administrative Review

    Two Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) petitioners contacted ANWAG about the length of time it is taking the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to conduct an Administrative Review of the denial to include those sites in the SEC.  ANWAG sent this letter to Secretary Burwell and looks forward to her response.


    ANWAG  featured at the Rocky Flats 25th Anniversary of the Rocky Flats FBI Raid

  • What Do We Know about Rocky Flats Workers' Health Issues, 25 Years Later, Part 1
  • What Do We Know about Rocky Flats Workers' Health Issues, 25 Years Later, Part 2
  • What Do We Know about Rocky Flats Workers' Health Issues, 25 Years Later, Part 3
  • What Do We Know about Rocky Flats Workers' Health Issues, 25 Years Later, Part 4

    ANWAG meets with Department of Labor, Department of Energy and NIOSH

    Representatives from the Departments of Labor, Energy and Health and Human Services accepted ANWAG's invitation to meet to discuss the advocates concerns with EEOICPA.  We met in Denver on February 20, 2014.  ANWAG provided a summary of the items covered at the meeting.


    New Problems surface in DEEOIC's Site Exposure Matrix (SEM)

    DEEOIC has revised the SEM and has removed useful information.  It has also come to ANWAG's attention that DEEOIC has a more extensive version of the SEM which Claims Examiners use rather than the public SEM which is available to everyone else.  This begs the question, Why did DEEOIC spend over one million dollars having the public SEM evaluated rather than the in-house SEM they use to administer the claims.  On August 22, 2013 ANWAG sent a letter to Director Leiton raising this and other questions.  DOL responded to ANWAG on September 12, 2013.


    DEEOIC's Policy Teleconference Notes/Memos

    Have you had a claim denied based on a DEEOIC memo?  Turns out that they are not meant to be used to deny claims as they are pre-decisional documents.  Director Leiton explained that the reason DEEOIC will not release these memos to advocates is because disclosure "would have a "chilling effect" upon DEEOIC's internal deliberative process and would lead to premature disclosure of policy discussions which may or may not ever be finalized and issued as part of official statements of policy in the EEOICPA Procedure Manual."  Donna Hand of Help by Hand has generously shared this letter along with a waiver for claimants to use it if their claim has been denied based on one of these memos. 

    However, DEEOIC has previously released teleconference notes through the FOIA process.  It is not clear how releasing these teleconference notes did not have the same "chilling effect".  This seems to shed doubt on DEEOIC's claim that it would be detrimental to release the information.


    Classification of EEOICPA Facilities

    EEOICPA involves many issues that affect claims decisions.  One such issue that ANWAG has followed for many years is how DEEOIC decides that a facility is a DOE facility under the law.  ANWAG has been discussing this issue with DEEOIC for a number of months.  Here is our latest letter and supporting documents.  We will keep you updated on DEEOIC's response. 

  • On March 14, 2013, ANWAG sent DEEOIC a letter requesting clarification on how certain sites were classified.
  • On April 12, 2013 DEEOIC replied.
  • On May 17, 2013 ANWAG replied and asked for clarification.
  • On June 11, 2013 DEEOIC replied.
  • On August 19, 2013 ANWAG replied and asked for clarification.
  •  Some of the evidence backing up ANWAG's recommendations for reclassification are listed below:

  • Meeting with Loral-American Beryllium Personnel memo--May 16, 1983
  • Implementation of New Cleaning Procedures at Loral American Beryllium Company memo--August 15, 1984 
  • "Q" Room Expansion at Loral American Beryllium Corporation memo--October 15, 1984
  • "Q" Room Expansion at Loral American Beryllium Corporation memo--October 17, 1984
  • Amendment to "Q" Room Expansion Letter Dated 10-17-84--November 7, 1984
  • Letter from Loral American Beryllium to Rockwell International--February 11, 1985
  • Letter from Rockwell International to Loral American Beryllium Corporation--March 5, 1985
  • Letter from Rockwell International to Loral American Beryllium Corporation--July 25, 1985
  • Rockwell International Trip Report memo--August 13, 1985

    NEW Institute of Medicine Report

    DOL contracted with the Institute of Medicine to, "provide a scientific assessment to identify strengths and weaknesses of the SEM and make recommendations for addressing links to chemical usage/exposure" on September 27, 2011.  The IOM Review was released to the public in March 27, 2013.  Many of the issues raised in the IOM report have previously been raised by ANWAG multiple times including a July 16, 2009 tele-meeting, as well as in the March 22, 2010 Government Accountability Office report entitled, "Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would Improve Program's Credibility".

    On April 12, 2013 ANWAG released the "Analysis of the Institute of Medicine's Review of Department of Labor's Site Exposure Matrix and Department of Labor's Response to the Recommendations".


    ANWAG alerts Department of HHS Inspector General of possible Malfeasance

    ANWAG learned from emails received through the Freedom of Information Act that some NIOSH staff members may have withheld evidence from the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health.  The information reveled in these emails may have caused Special Exposure Cohorts to be decided improperly.  On February 28, 2013 ANWAG alerted the Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General's office and the Advisory Board president of this matter.

    Due Process denied Injured Nuclear Workers

    ANWAG issued a press release after leaning learned this week that DEEOIC will be reviewing EEOICPA claims to look for residual contamination at certain Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) sites but will NOT notify claimants that their claims are being reviewed.  ANWAG feels that this deprives claimants of the ability to provide DEEOIC with additional information since there will be no way for them to know DEEOIC has reviewed their file. 


    DOL's criteria for Chronic Beryllium disease

    On March 9, 2012 ANWAG sent DOL a letter about a possible change in the criteria DOL is using to decide Chronic Beryllium Disease claims.  CBD is defined in the law and the law does not require a diagnosis of CBD.  It appeared that DOL may have been requiring a diagnosis of CBD to train their Claims Examiners rather than using the criteria established in the law.  On July 24, 2012 DOL responded.


    National Day of Remembrance

    Senator Mark Udall introduced Senate Resolution 519, designating October 30 as a National Day of Remembrance for the nuclear weapons workers.  He was joined by Senators Alexander, Bingaman, Brown (OH), Cantwell, Corker, Crapo, Gillibrand, Graham, McConnell, Reid, and Udall (NM), who co-sponsored the resolution. A note of thanks to the Senators would be appropriate.  If your Senator has not co-signed the legislation, please ask that he or she supports it.  Many thanks to Cold War Patriots for continuing to bring this issue to Congress.  Stay tuned for the events planned for this year's celebrations.


    DOL Issues

    On March 20, 2012 ANWAG sent a letter to DOL requesting clarification on some of the responses DOL made to National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) Committee to Review the Department of Labor’s Site Exposure Matrix (SEM).  DOL provided clarifications in a letter dated May 21, 2012.

    On January 23, 2012 the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine held their first meeting to review DEEIOIC's Site Exposure Matrix. Terrie Barrie was invited by them to present the advocates' position on the issues surrounding the SEM and claim adjudication.  Ms. Barrie both spoke to the committee and provided them with printed material.  Dr. Laurence Fuortes from the University of Iowa College of Public Health also provided the committee with his observations on SEM and HazMap.

    On January 5, 2011 ANWAG issued a press release alleging that DOL has found a way around President Obama’s memorandum on Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and is effectively denying advocates for sickened nuclear weapons workers requests for documents by charging outlandish search fees.

    Because there has been no progress with any meaningful reforms to EEOICPA this year, ANWAG developed a thought provoking essay describing some of the serious flaws with the program.

    Terrie Barrie: "More must be done" was published in the Craig Daily Press on December 28, 2011.


    NIOSH Issues

    ANWAG is concerned about possible conflict of interest problems within EEOICPA.  To begin to address these problems ANWAG wrote a letter to Dr. Howard of NIOSH regarding a possible conflict of interest rising from the Designated Federal Official (DFO) for the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health who authored the final rules for the dose reconstruction and Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) petition processes.

    ANWAG also sent a letter to Director Hinnefeld of NIOSH regarding possible conflicts of interest between contractors Dade Moeller and Associates and EG&G for their financial involvements with EEOICPA and DOE sites.  

    NIOSH responded to this concern on January 3, 2012.


    2016 Advocates Meeting with Agencies

    2016-3-30 Follow up questions


    Program wide Issues

    There has been some confusion within EEOICPA on whether certain x-ray reports are valid of not.  Some claimants have had their "b-reads" refused if the technician did not sign the report.  NIOSH's Dr. Howard clarified the issue for ANWAG.  If you have had this problem, please contact ANWAG or EECAP for help.

    ANWAG has put together a report on the problems claimants are having with Department of Labor and NIOSH as well as solutions to those problems.

    Linde Ceramics


    ANWAG Newsletters

  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 1, 2012
  • November 30, 2011
  • October 17 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

    back to top

     Photos courtesy of DOE and Library of Congress

    ter id="footer_bg">
    Site powered by i3dTHEMES